All checks were successful
Deploy Quartz site to GitHub Pages / build (push) Successful in 5m15s
2722 lines
58 KiB
Markdown
2722 lines
58 KiB
Markdown
# Body weight Homeostasis SD (1).pdf
|
||
|
||
**OCR Transcript**
|
||
|
||
- Pages: 63
|
||
- OCR Engine: pymupdf
|
||
- Quality Score: 1.00
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 1
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
1
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
BODY WEIGHT HOMEOSTASIS
|
||
PROFESSOR SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
1
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Measuring obesity and obesity
|
||
statistics
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 2
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
2
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
DEFINITIONS
|
||
Overweight and obesity are
|
||
defined as abnormal or
|
||
excessive fat accumulation
|
||
that presents a risk to
|
||
health.
|
||
ADULTS: A body mass index
|
||
(BMI) over 25 is considered
|
||
overweight and over 30 is
|
||
obese.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
>18.5
|
||
18.5-24.9
|
||
25.0-29.9
|
||
30.0-34.9
|
||
>35.0
|
||
BODY MASS INDEX (kg/m2)
|
||
3
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Body mass index (BMI) = weight/height2 (kg/m2)
|
||
Weight (kg)
|
||
Height
|
||
(m)
|
||
BMI
|
||
Normal
|
||
20-25
|
||
Overweight
|
||
>25
|
||
Obese
|
||
>30
|
||
Morbidly Obese
|
||
>40
|
||
BMI for adults
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 3
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
3
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Weight (kg)
|
||
Height
|
||
(m)
|
||
BMI
|
||
Normal
|
||
20-25
|
||
Overweight
|
||
>25
|
||
Obese
|
||
>30
|
||
Morbidly Obese
|
||
>40
|
||
Weight: 110 Kg
|
||
Height: 1.8 m
|
||
à BMI: 34
|
||
A cautionary note …..
|
||
This calculation does not predict obesity for body
|
||
builders (muscle) or for those that are very tall
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
5
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Age 5-19:
|
||
Use BMI-for-age
|
||
Overweight : >1 standard
|
||
deviation above the growth
|
||
reference mean
|
||
Obesity: >2 standard deviations
|
||
above the growth reference
|
||
mean
|
||
Age
|
||
5
|
||
19 yrs
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
BMI-for-Age GIRLS
|
||
obese
|
||
overweight
|
||
BMI (Kg/m2)
|
||
6
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 4
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
4
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Age <5
|
||
Use Weight-for-age
|
||
Overweight: >2 standard
|
||
deviations above the growth
|
||
reference mean
|
||
Obesity: >3 standard deviations
|
||
above the growth reference
|
||
mean
|
||
Age
|
||
Birth
|
||
5 yrs
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Weight (kg)
|
||
Weight-for-Age GIRLS
|
||
7
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Direct methods for assessing fat mass
|
||
Underwater
|
||
weighing
|
||
Accurate. Was gold
|
||
standard before more
|
||
advanced methods.
|
||
Fat vs non-fat tissue
|
||
have different
|
||
densities.
|
||
Whole-Body (ADP)
|
||
Air Displacement
|
||
Plethysmography
|
||
Like underwater weighing –
|
||
displace air instead of water.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Total body water (TBW). Drink
|
||
deuterated (or tritiated) water à ends
|
||
up in the fat-free compartment à
|
||
sampling gives TBW. From this, fat mass
|
||
can be calculated (since body weight is
|
||
known).
|
||
2H2O
|
||
H2O
|
||
2H2O
|
||
H2O
|
||
+
|
||
5 hours
|
||
e.g.
|
||
1 liter
|
||
e.g.
|
||
80 liters
|
||
Dilution:
|
||
1:80
|
||
Sample (eg saliva)
|
||
(known)
|
||
(unknown)
|
||
8
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 5
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
5
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Direct methods for assessing fat mass
|
||
Dual X-Ray absorptiometry (DEXA)
|
||
X-rays of two different
|
||
energies. One absorbed
|
||
more strongly by fat.
|
||
Subtract one image from
|
||
the other à amount of
|
||
fat relative to other
|
||
tissues at each point.
|
||
Measures total fat and
|
||
gives distribution. €€€.
|
||
Involves exposure to
|
||
(low level) radiation.
|
||
OFTEN USED IN
|
||
RESEARCH.
|
||
Computerized tomography
|
||
Cross-sectional radiographs of
|
||
abdomen à computerized
|
||
measurement of total fat area and
|
||
regional fat determination (e.g.
|
||
subcutaneous versus visceral fat). €€€.
|
||
Radiation (like many x-rays).
|
||
Bioelectrical impedance
|
||
Resistance between 2 electrodes is
|
||
higher in obese individuals.
|
||
Resistance high for fat & low for
|
||
water. Not accurate.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
9
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Indirect methods for assessing fat mass
|
||
ØSkinfold measurements – subcutaneous fat
|
||
measured using calipers. Use conversion tables
|
||
to estimate body fat % to about 3-5% accuracy.
|
||
More useful than BMI in athletes.
|
||
ØWaist:hip ratio – cut-offs are ≥ 0.90 cm in
|
||
men and ≥ 0.85 cm in women
|
||
ØBMI - based on weight and height (kg/m2)
|
||
Most obesity
|
||
statistics are
|
||
based on
|
||
BMI data
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Source: hereandnowwellness.com
|
||
10
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 6
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
6
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
2020: % US adults with an obese BMI (>30)
|
||
11
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
1992
|
||
2000
|
||
2010
|
||
Sweden –
|
||
Prevalence of
|
||
Overweight (%)
|
||
% BMI>25 kg/m2
|
||
<18
|
||
>18-25
|
||
>25-35
|
||
>35
|
||
And in 2022
|
||
Adults – 35% overweight, 16%
|
||
obese
|
||
Children – 20% overweight.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
DOI:10.1177/1403494815579478
|
||
12
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 7
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
7
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Health consequences of obesity
|
||
OBESITY
|
||
CARDIOVASCULAR
|
||
DISEASE
|
||
TYPE 2 DIABETES
|
||
Increased risk:
|
||
Breast cancer
|
||
Bowel cancer
|
||
Osteoporosis
|
||
Lung disease
|
||
Strokes
|
||
Heart attacks
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
13
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Metabolic Syndrome
|
||
A cluster of conditions that occur
|
||
together, increasing risk of heart
|
||
disease, stroke and type 2
|
||
diabetes.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
About two-thirds of people
|
||
suffering from obesity develop
|
||
metabolic syndrome.
|
||
14
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 8
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
8
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Metabolic Syndrome Diagnosis (WHO 1998)
|
||
Type 2 diabetes plus 2 out of 3 of the other
|
||
components:
|
||
Type 2 diabetes:
|
||
Fasting glucose (> 6.5
|
||
mmol/L)
|
||
¯ Glucose tolerance or
|
||
Insulin resistance
|
||
High Blood Pressure
|
||
Visceral Obesity
|
||
Blood fat disturbance:
|
||
Triglycerides
|
||
¯ HDL (good)
|
||
cholesterol
|
||
LDL (bad cholesterol)
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
15
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Debate regarding metabolic syndrome
|
||
We say that “it
|
||
is just a
|
||
constellation
|
||
of symptoms
|
||
or sub-
|
||
diseases”
|
||
We disagree.
|
||
Surely there is
|
||
a causal
|
||
relation
|
||
between
|
||
symptoms –
|
||
perhaps even
|
||
a common
|
||
cause?
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Depositphotos
|
||
16
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 9
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
9
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Below
|
||
waist
|
||
Above
|
||
waist
|
||
Increased risk of metabolic disturbances
|
||
Visceral fat à Free Fatty Acid (FFA) release , e.g. to the liver (bad)
|
||
à release of adipokines* (exception is adiponectin,
|
||
whose secretion is decreased).
|
||
*Adipokines are fat-derived cytokines such as leptin and resistin and also
|
||
immune-stimulating hormones e.g. interleukin-6 (IL-6), TNFa
|
||
§ Android
|
||
§ Central
|
||
§ Abdominal
|
||
§ Truncal
|
||
§ Upper body
|
||
§ Gynoid
|
||
§ Peripheral
|
||
§ Gluteo-femoral
|
||
§ Lower body
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
17
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
How does obesity cause insulin resistance?
|
||
1. Free fatty acid ”overflow hypothesis”
|
||
2. Adipokines, immune stimulating hormones from white
|
||
adipose tissue (↑ TNFa, ↑ resistin, ↓adiponectin)
|
||
Both can be
|
||
true!
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
18
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 10
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
10
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Glucose
|
||
Glucose
|
||
Glucose
|
||
Glucose
|
||
Health
|
||
Disease
|
||
1. Fat overflow hypothesis. Fat outside fat tissue is
|
||
dangerous for metabolic health
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
19
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
2. “Adipokine” hypothesis
|
||
Immune stimulating
|
||
hormones (adipokines)
|
||
from adipocytes and
|
||
macrophages in fat à
|
||
inflammationà diabetes
|
||
in liver, muscle and
|
||
pancreas
|
||
Adipocyte
|
||
Macrophage
|
||
Blood vessel
|
||
Glucose
|
||
Glucose
|
||
Healthy
|
||
Metabolic syndrome
|
||
adipokines
|
||
Insulin
|
||
Insulin
|
||
IL-1β
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
20
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 11
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
11
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
The relation between obesity, adipokines and their
|
||
impact on insulin resistance
|
||
↑ TNFα
|
||
↑ resistin
|
||
↓ adiponectin
|
||
↑ leptin
|
||
INSULIN
|
||
RESISTANCE
|
||
+
|
||
_
|
||
Leptin resistance
|
||
Adipokines
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
21
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Adipokines in metabolic syndrome
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Adiponectin – Levels reduced in
|
||
metabolic syndrome. In normal weight
|
||
individuals, it has beneficial effects
|
||
(increases insulin sensitivity, anti-
|
||
inflammatory, anti-artherosclerosis).
|
||
1. modify insulin sensitivity e.g.
|
||
acylation stimulating protein, tumor
|
||
necrosis factor α (TNF-α), IL-6,
|
||
resistin, visfatin, apelin, omentin,
|
||
chemerin, leptin and adiponectin.
|
||
TNFa & IL6 - Levels increased in
|
||
metabolic syndrome.
|
||
Proinflammatory. Produced by
|
||
adipocytes and macrophages. Cause
|
||
insulin resistance and increase
|
||
circulating free fatty acids.
|
||
Adipokines include proteins that:
|
||
3. impact on vascularity e.g.
|
||
angiotensinogen, plasminogen
|
||
inhibitor protein, PAI-1) among
|
||
others.
|
||
2. ↓ insulin release (e.g. IL-1β)
|
||
22
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 12
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
12
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Adipokines in metabolic syndrome
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Role in many metabolic processes:
|
||
Energy expenditure, neuroendocrine function, immune function,
|
||
vascular remodelling, angiogenesis, fatty acid oxidation,
|
||
lipogenesis, gluconeogenesis, glucose uptake, insulin
|
||
signalling, and energy expenditure in metabolically active
|
||
tissues such as the liver, skeletal muscle and the brain.
|
||
Site of action:
|
||
Can act locally, through autocrine/paracrine mechanisms, or
|
||
systemically, through endocrine effects
|
||
I’m not expecting
|
||
you to memorize this
|
||
list but to realise
|
||
they have many &
|
||
diverse functions
|
||
23
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
↔Cortisol (despite signs of ↑ cortisol
|
||
activity - looks like Cushings syndrome!)
|
||
↑ androgens in women (polycystic
|
||
ovarian syndrome, PCOS)
|
||
↓ androgens in men
|
||
↓ growth hormone
|
||
Additional endocrine changes in metabolic syndrome
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
24
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 13
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
13
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Body weight homeostasis
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
- Powerful physiological processes aim to keep body weight constant
|
||
25
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Energy Expenditure:
|
||
- Basal Metabolism
|
||
- Physical activity
|
||
- Adaptive thermogenesis**
|
||
Food intake & energy expenditure balanced à body weight maintained at a “set point”.
|
||
1. Genetic
|
||
predisposition*
|
||
2. Long term changes
|
||
in body weight
|
||
3. Obesogenic
|
||
environment
|
||
*Predisposition= tendency to suffer from
|
||
**Occurs in brown adipose tissue.
|
||
Factors influencing
|
||
the “set point”
|
||
Ø Target weight maintained with an extraordinary degree of control.
|
||
Ø “Set point” controller = brain (especially hypothalamus)
|
||
“Set point” hypothesis of body weight regulation
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
26
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 14
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
14
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
In obesity, there is a defense of an elevated body weight, rather
|
||
than the absence of regulation.
|
||
Evidence that we defend our body weight at a set point?
|
||
ØBody weight defended despite diet attempts ( hunger & ¯
|
||
metabolism).
|
||
ØDiet and lifestyle changes ineffective.
|
||
ØReturn to “set point” (normal weight) after dieting or illness and
|
||
after voluntary overfeeding.
|
||
ØThe 0.5 kg gained per year during ageing (average) =
|
||
surprisingly little
|
||
“Set point” is a hypothesis to explain obesity!!!
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Age: 20
|
||
50
|
||
+ 30 kg
|
||
27
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Weight gain as we age
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Age 20
|
||
Age 50
|
||
+ 15 kg
|
||
Powerful Physiological Systems
|
||
Control Energy Balance & Body Weight.
|
||
1 g fat = 9 kcal
|
||
15 kg fat = 130,000 kcal
|
||
13,000 kcal in 30 years
|
||
= 86 kcal/week
|
||
8 minutes
|
||
running
|
||
or
|
||
Per week
|
||
imbalance:
|
||
28
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 15
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
15
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Change in weight (kg)
|
||
Overfeeding
|
||
(6736 kcal/day)
|
||
months
|
||
Body weight
|
||
Fast mass
|
||
Pasquet P, Apfelbaum, M. Am J of Clin Nut 1994;60:861-3
|
||
“Guru Walla" fattening session
|
||
in the Massas ethnic group in
|
||
Northern Cameroon
|
||
"The fattening session resulted in a mean
|
||
extra energy intake of 955 MJ and an
|
||
increase of 17kg in body weight...Over
|
||
the whole overfeeding session, we noted
|
||
a 43.5% mean increase of resting
|
||
metabolic rate, which is much higher
|
||
than previously reported”
|
||
Evidence for set point: Return to normal weight after a
|
||
period of voluntary over-feeding
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
29
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Does energy expenditure adjust if we over- or under-eat
|
||
enough calories to alter our body weight?
|
||
Over-eat à gain 10% body weight
|
||
Diet à Lose 10% or 20% body weight
|
||
Measure
|
||
Energy
|
||
Expenditure
|
||
Predict
|
||
Energy
|
||
Expenditure
|
||
Difference??
|
||
Leibel RL et al. N Engl J Med 1995;332:621-628.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
30
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 16
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
16
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Does energy expenditure adjust if we over- or under-eat
|
||
enough calories to alter our body weight?
|
||
Leibel RL et al. N Engl J Med 1995;332:621-628.
|
||
Over-eating (à weight gain)
|
||
à Energy expenditure (> 500 kcal above
|
||
that predicted)
|
||
Food restriction (à weight loss)
|
||
à ¯ Energy expenditure (¯ was > 300 kcal
|
||
more than predicted)
|
||
Observed minus
|
||
predicted
|
||
total energy
|
||
expenditure
|
||
(kcal)
|
||
Dieter’s
|
||
curse
|
||
People go up in energy
|
||
expenditure when they gain
|
||
weight & down in energy
|
||
expenditure when they lose
|
||
it – more than expected!
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
31
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Body weight
|
||
Set
|
||
point
|
||
Free
|
||
choice
|
||
Free
|
||
choice
|
||
Free
|
||
choice
|
||
Under
|
||
Feed
|
||
Over
|
||
feed
|
||
¯ energy expenditure
|
||
appetite
|
||
energy expenditure
|
||
¯ appetite (less effective)
|
||
Both under- and over-nutrition can lead to weight gain
|
||
over time
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
32
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 17
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
17
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Food available
|
||
EAT!!!!
|
||
STORE ENERGY
|
||
(TO PREPARE FOR
|
||
FUTURE FAMINE)
|
||
HUNGER à search for
|
||
food
|
||
¯ METABOLISM à save
|
||
energy
|
||
survival
|
||
LEAN
|
||
ENVIRONMENT
|
||
Food scarce (famine)
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
THEN….. In our evolution, there was genetic pressure to
|
||
increase body weight
|
||
33
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
EAT!!!!
|
||
STORE ENERGY
|
||
(TO PREPARE FOR
|
||
FUTURE FAMINE)
|
||
OBESOGENIC
|
||
ENVIRONMENT
|
||
HUNGER à search for
|
||
food
|
||
¯ METABOLISM à save
|
||
energy
|
||
Food available 24/7
|
||
Dieting (attempts to limit weight gain)
|
||
Obesity
|
||
Same
|
||
genetic
|
||
pressures as
|
||
our
|
||
ancestors
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
NOW: Food is more available … but our genetics have
|
||
evolved to increase our body weight
|
||
EssayPlant.com
|
||
34
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 18
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
18
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Energy expenditure
|
||
Basal
|
||
Metabolism
|
||
Physical
|
||
activity
|
||
Adaptive
|
||
thermogenesis
|
||
Metabolism
|
||
Energy
|
||
Storage
|
||
(fat)
|
||
Total energy
|
||
expenditure
|
||
(= Heat+work
|
||
done on
|
||
environment)*
|
||
*When at rest, all energy
|
||
expenditure is equal to heat
|
||
produced (ie thermogenesis)
|
||
•Variable (at most 10% in modern life)
|
||
•Regulated by brain
|
||
•Responds to temperature & food intake
|
||
•Occurs in brown adipocyte mitochondria,
|
||
skeletal muscle & other sites
|
||
•Variable (~25%)
|
||
(~65%)
|
||
For performance of cellular & organ
|
||
functions:
|
||
•synthetic processes
|
||
•electrical work
|
||
•membrane transport
|
||
•detoxification
|
||
•degredation
|
||
Energy intake (Food)
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
35
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Energy dissipated (wasted) in the form of heat in response to environmental
|
||
changes, essentially cold exposure and food intake. It helps protect against
|
||
weight gain by causing a compensatory increase in energy expenditure
|
||
when we eat.
|
||
Adaptive thermogenesis
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
36
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 19
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
19
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Function = energy expenditure
|
||
(not storage).
|
||
Present in interscapular area.
|
||
Present in human infants but
|
||
declines with age.
|
||
Sympathetic nervous system
|
||
(SNS) increases BAT activity in
|
||
response to cold or increased
|
||
food ingestion. Adaptive
|
||
thermogenesis.
|
||
Heat generated in mitochondria
|
||
via “uncoupling”.
|
||
Electron
|
||
transport
|
||
chain
|
||
MITOCHONDRIA
|
||
Fatty
|
||
acids &
|
||
glucose H+
|
||
ATP
|
||
synthase
|
||
H+
|
||
ADP
|
||
ATP
|
||
(Energy storage)
|
||
UCP1
|
||
H+
|
||
H+
|
||
UCP1=uncoupling protein 1
|
||
It is present in BAT but not in
|
||
other cells. It is increased by over-
|
||
eating and decreases with fasting
|
||
HEAT
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Brown Adipose Tissue (BAT)
|
||
37
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
PET scan after intravenous
|
||
injection of 18F-
|
||
fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) à
|
||
BAT visualized
|
||
New information on BAT:
|
||
Present in human adults.
|
||
Women have more than men.
|
||
More in younger adults
|
||
More BAT in lean subjects?
|
||
Therapeutic interest?
|
||
Stimulation of BAT à energy
|
||
expenditure & weight loss
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
2010: BAT also discovered to be present in human adults
|
||
DOI:10.1038/ijo.2010.241
|
||
38
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 20
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
20
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
2. Thyroid hormones (TRβ on BAT) - chronic
|
||
UCP-1 expression in BAT
|
||
(BUT NOTE: THEY ARE ALSO THE PRIMARY CONTROLLER OF THE BASAL METABOLIC RATE;
|
||
ACTING ON MOST BODY CELLS (NOT BRAIN) TO ENEGY EXPENDITURE)
|
||
1. Noradrenaline (β3 AR on BAT) – acute
|
||
Caused by sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation. Contribute to heat
|
||
produced when emotionally stressed.
|
||
Metabolism of brown adipose tissue (BAT).
|
||
UCP1 activation and hence energy expenditure
|
||
3. Glucocorticoids (via glucocorticoid receptor on BAT)
|
||
Inhibitory effect on BAT.
|
||
Suppresses noradrenaline-induced UCP1 activation
|
||
4. Leptin (via ObRB in hypothalamus that stimulate SNS)
|
||
UCP-1 expression in BAT
|
||
Hormones important for BAT activation
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
39
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
BMI
|
||
Energy
|
||
expenditure
|
||
Obese
|
||
Ex-obese
|
||
(↓ diet-induced
|
||
thermogenesis,
|
||
eg ↓ T3)
|
||
Lean
|
||
A formerly obese individual
|
||
will require ~300–400 fewer
|
||
calories per day to maintain
|
||
the same body weight and
|
||
physical activity level as a
|
||
never-obese individual of
|
||
the same body weight.
|
||
Reduced energy expenditure in the post-obese state
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
40
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 21
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
21
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Body weight Homeostasis - the
|
||
control systems
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
41
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Effector systems
|
||
Sensors
|
||
Altered Internal
|
||
Environment
|
||
Principles of homeostasis – keeping (body weight)
|
||
constant
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Controller
|
||
Homeostasis
|
||
- maintaining a
|
||
steady state.
|
||
- involved feedback
|
||
systems.
|
||
42
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 22
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
22
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Food intake
|
||
Energy expenditure
|
||
Adaptive thermogenesis
|
||
Sensors
|
||
???
|
||
Energy deficit/excess
|
||
Key questions:
|
||
1. What are the control
|
||
systems in the brain that
|
||
alter food intake & energy
|
||
expenditure?
|
||
2. What are the sensors?
|
||
3. Why do these fail in ways
|
||
that result in body weight
|
||
gain & obesity?
|
||
Hunger/full etc
|
||
Longterm
|
||
Short term
|
||
Principles of homeostasis – keeping (body weight)
|
||
constant
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
43
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Locke et al Nature. 2015 Feb 12;518(7538):197-206
|
||
Genes linked to
|
||
BMI are mostly
|
||
found in brain, and
|
||
notably in the
|
||
hypothalamus
|
||
Energy homeostasis control system is in brain
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
44
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 23
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
23
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Brain areas involved in energy balance regulation
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Hypothalamic and brainstem autonomic
|
||
circuitry (orange) includes the arcuate nucleus
|
||
(ARC), the dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH),
|
||
the dorsal-vagal complex (DVC), the lateral
|
||
hypothalamus (LH), the pontine parabrachial
|
||
nucleus (PBN), the preoptic area (POA), the
|
||
paraventricular hypothalamus (PVH), the raphe
|
||
pallidus (RPa), and the ventromedial
|
||
hypothalamus (VMH). Structures of the brain
|
||
executive system (green) include the anterior
|
||
cingulate cortex (ACC), the insula (Ins.), and
|
||
the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Structures of the
|
||
brain reward system (blue) include the
|
||
amygdala (Amy.), hippocampus (Hipp.), Ins.,
|
||
LH, nucleus accumbens (NAc), striatum (Stri.),
|
||
and ventral tegmental area (VTA).
|
||
DOI:10.1111/nyas.13263
|
||
45
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
§Nearly all hypothalamic nuclei
|
||
engaged.
|
||
§Especially - Mediobasal
|
||
hypothalamus (MBH) - includes
|
||
arcuate nucleus (Arc) and
|
||
ventromedial nucleus (VMN) – energy
|
||
intake and adaptive thermogenesis.
|
||
§Arc cells project to many other
|
||
hypothalamic (and extra-
|
||
hypothalamic) areas to regulate
|
||
energy balance.
|
||
§Lateral hypothalamus – feeding
|
||
center.
|
||
Autonomic control of energy balance: Hypothalamus
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
VMH, LH,
|
||
DMH, POA
|
||
Arc
|
||
PVH
|
||
Appetitice &
|
||
Consummatory
|
||
Behaviours
|
||
Adaptive
|
||
thermogenesis
|
||
Autonomic &
|
||
neuroendocrine
|
||
control of food intake
|
||
& energy
|
||
expenditure
|
||
Hypothalamic areas regulating energy balance.
|
||
+ VMN
|
||
48
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 24
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
24
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
1. Lesions of key hypothalamic areas cause animals to lose
|
||
control of their set point for body weight.
|
||
Ventromedial nucleus (VMN) lesion à obesity.
|
||
Role = satiety center
|
||
Lateral Hypothalamus (LH) lesion à appetite loss.
|
||
Role= hunger center
|
||
2. Arcuate nucleus (Arc): Contains orexigenic AgRP/NPY
|
||
neurones and anorexigenic POMC neurones.
|
||
3. Leptin Fat-derived hormone that suppresses food intake.
|
||
Activates POMC & inhibits AgRP/NPY neurones. Informs
|
||
brain on fat stores. Leptin resistance in obesity.
|
||
4. Leptin and leptin receptor gene mutations – extremely
|
||
rare monogenic cause of obesity.
|
||
Johan’s hypothalamic lecture – some key points
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Adapted from M.W. Schwartz
|
||
49
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
1. Dorsal vagal complex (DVC)
|
||
§
|
||
nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS),
|
||
§
|
||
area postrema (AP)
|
||
§
|
||
dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus
|
||
nerve (DMV)
|
||
Integrate homeostatic signals about
|
||
nutritional and energy reserve status.
|
||
Involved in appetite suppression, malaise,
|
||
response to infections, gut-brain signals,
|
||
gastric distension, swallowing etc.
|
||
Important target for the anorexigenic
|
||
peptide, GLP-1 (see later)
|
||
Autonomic control of energy balance: Brainstem
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
DOI:10.1111/nyas.13263
|
||
50
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 25
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
25
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
2.Parabrachial nucleus (an anorexic
|
||
hub)
|
||
•
|
||
Relays sensory information to forebrain.
|
||
•
|
||
CGRP neurons relay aversive signals (e.g.,
|
||
food poisoning, pain, itch etc) to the
|
||
amygdala (CeA), the bed nucleus of the stria
|
||
terminalis (BNST) and other brain regions.
|
||
•
|
||
Chronic activation of CGRP neurons can
|
||
lead to severe anorexia and starvation.
|
||
•
|
||
When activated, CGRP neurones block
|
||
incoming orexigenic information from AgRP
|
||
neurones in Arc.
|
||
•
|
||
Other PBN neurons transmit taste,
|
||
temperature, respiratory, satiety, thirst, salt-
|
||
appetite, or glucose counter-regulatory
|
||
signals.
|
||
Autonomic control of energy balance: Brainstem
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
CGRP =
|
||
calcitonin gene-
|
||
related peptide
|
||
Anorexigenic
|
||
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.03.007
|
||
51
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
3. Others
|
||
The Raphe Pallidus (RPA) receives
|
||
thermoregulatory information from
|
||
the hypothalamus and projects to
|
||
the intermediolateral nucleus (IML)
|
||
of the spinal cord, from which
|
||
originate the preganglionic neurons
|
||
of the sympathetic nervous system
|
||
(SNS) outflow to BAT.
|
||
Autonomic control of energy balance: Brainstem
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
POA (Preoptic area), DMH (Dorsomedial hypothalamus)
|
||
DOI:10.1111/nyas.13263
|
||
52
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 26
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
26
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Role of the reward system
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Motivation for food, including palatable
|
||
foods.
|
||
Pleasure from food and food choice
|
||
Important when hungry (to help restore
|
||
energy balance) but also to ensure we eat
|
||
in excess of metabolic requirement (to help
|
||
prepare for a future famine).
|
||
Golocalprov.com
|
||
53
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
• Sustaining energy – eat when available, energy store
|
||
for future need
|
||
• Nutrition – variety
|
||
• Food selection/preference – sweet, salty, umami >>
|
||
sour, bitter (edible >> poisonous)
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Food reward – eating for survival (adaptation)
|
||
54
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 27
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
27
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Food reward – eating against survival (maladaptation)
|
||
Vitagazette.com
|
||
News.bbc.co.cuk
|
||
55
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
u They promote eating in the absence of hunger or
|
||
energy need (= hedonic, non-homeostatic feeding)
|
||
u Certain foods make us want to eat more
|
||
(=reinforcement)
|
||
“Appetite comes with eating; the more
|
||
one has, the more one would have”.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Food reward – eating for survival
|
||
56
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 28
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
28
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
“Hunger is the best spice”
|
||
Swedish
|
||
Reward value also reflects:
|
||
Palatability, taste, orosensory experience,
|
||
reward expectation/prediction, genetics
|
||
“A good meal ought to begin
|
||
with hunger”.
|
||
French
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Hunger increases the reward value of foods
|
||
57
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Goldstone et al., 2009, EJN
|
||
à Brains pathways involved in
|
||
(visual) food reward processing
|
||
are regulated by metabolic
|
||
signals
|
||
FED
|
||
FASTED
|
||
vs
|
||
ACC
|
||
amygdala
|
||
insula
|
||
ventral
|
||
striatum
|
||
lateral
|
||
OFC
|
||
medial
|
||
OFC
|
||
Brain reward areas:
|
||
- Activated by pictures of
|
||
rewarding foods.
|
||
- Linked to food reward!
|
||
- Regulated by nutritional
|
||
state.
|
||
Δ
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Brain areas linked to reward are more activated by
|
||
photos of palatable foods when hungry than when fed
|
||
58
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 29
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
29
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
OFC & Amygdala à reward
|
||
value of food
|
||
Insula à taste & hedonic
|
||
evaluation
|
||
NAcc, VTA & dorsal striatum
|
||
à Motivational and incentive
|
||
properties of rewards
|
||
Lateral hypothalamus à
|
||
regulates rewarding response
|
||
to palatable food and drives
|
||
reward-seeking behaviours
|
||
Adapted from Kenny PJ, 2010 Neuron 69: 664
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Brain Areas Activated in Response to Palatable Food
|
||
or Food Associated Cues
|
||
59
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Wanting/motivation
|
||
Liking/hedonics
|
||
DOPAMINE (VTA à NAcc)
|
||
OPIOIDS
|
||
ENDOCANNABINOIDS
|
||
Muscle
|
||
BAT
|
||
MBH – mediobasal hypothalamus
|
||
DVC – dorsovagal complex
|
||
PFC – Prefrontal cortex
|
||
DVC – Anterior Cinglate Gyrus
|
||
Dopamine and “friends”
|
||
DOI:10.1111/nyas.13263
|
||
60
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 30
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
30
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Ventral Tegmental
|
||
Area (VTA)
|
||
Nucleus
|
||
Accumbens (NAc)
|
||
dopamine
|
||
The midbrain dopamine neurones signalling reward
|
||
VTA
|
||
é Cell firing
|
||
NAc
|
||
é dopamine release
|
||
Natural and artificial rewards
|
||
+
|
||
sex
|
||
food
|
||
gambling
|
||
drugs
|
||
alcohol
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Theguardian.com
|
||
Rodin
|
||
Picasso
|
||
Cezanne
|
||
Jean Kieffer
|
||
Adriaen Brouwer
|
||
61
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
dopamine
|
||
Ventral Tegmental
|
||
Area (VTA)
|
||
Nucleus
|
||
Accumbens (NAcc)
|
||
What does accumbal dopamine actually signal?
|
||
u Pleasure of eating
|
||
(Small et al, Neuroimage 2003)
|
||
u Novel (unexpected) rewards
|
||
(Norgren et al, Physiol Behan, 2006)
|
||
u Reward anticipation (cue-
|
||
induced eg smell)
|
||
(Epstein et al, Psychol Rev, 2009)
|
||
u Motivational/incentive value
|
||
(Volkow et al, Synapse, 2002)
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Increases “wanting” and approach behaviour for food
|
||
Picturequotes.com
|
||
Golocalprov.com
|
||
62
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 31
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
31
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Food Reward
|
||
Generation
|
||
Food
|
||
Intake
|
||
“Gluttony” Hypothesis
|
||
Reward
|
||
“Reward deficiency” Hypothesis
|
||
Reward
|
||
http://commons.wikimedia.org
|
||
/wikiCategory:Animations_from
|
||
_Anatomography
|
||
Evidence favours a reward deficiency hypothesis
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Obesity is associated with an altered reward function
|
||
Rubens
|
||
63
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
↓ Striatal dopamine D2
|
||
receptor availability in obese
|
||
subjects.
|
||
(Similar to drug-addicted
|
||
subjects).
|
||
lean
|
||
morbidly obese
|
||
… supports the reward deficiency hypothesis in obesity
|
||
Volkow et al. 2008, Phil.
|
||
Trans. R. Soc. B
|
||
363:3191
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Obesity is associated with an altered reward function
|
||
64
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 32
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
32
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Potential “reward” contributors to obesity:
|
||
1. Genetic and other pre-existing
|
||
differences in reward function
|
||
3. Intake of palatable food as an
|
||
escalating, addictive process
|
||
2. Changes in reward function that are
|
||
secondary effects of the obese state.
|
||
Could some obese patients be food addicted?
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Obesity is associated with an altered reward function
|
||
Rubens
|
||
65
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Probably not a chemical-like addiction.
|
||
In man, there is no solid evidence that any food,
|
||
ingredient, combination of ingredients or
|
||
additive (exception = caffeine) causes us to
|
||
become addicted to it!
|
||
More likely a behavioural addiction.
|
||
Certain obese individuals appear to
|
||
express addiction-like behaviour to food
|
||
eg binge eating disorder
|
||
http://www.neurofast.eu/consensus/
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Could food be addictive?
|
||
66
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 33
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
33
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
See Ziauddeen H et al., 2012, Nat Rev Neurosci
|
||
Tolerance
|
||
Dependence
|
||
Withdrawal
|
||
Failed
|
||
abstinence
|
||
Preoccupation
|
||
Continued use
|
||
despite known
|
||
consequences
|
||
Many addiction criteria are difficult
|
||
to apply to food and require severity
|
||
or impairment thresholds
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
67
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
|
||
Food addiction score
|
||
Food receipt: Activation in medial OFC
|
||
Gearhardt AN et al., 2011, Arch Gen Psychiatry
|
||
Questionnaire à Food addiction score
|
||
fMRI brain imaging à Areas activated by anticipation & receipt of
|
||
palatable food.
|
||
Correlations and comparisons
|
||
“Food addicted” subjects - differing brain activity response – both
|
||
for food anticipation and receipt.
|
||
fMRI
|
||
response
|
||
in OFC
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
People that score high on the Yale Food Addiction Scale
|
||
have a different brain response to food
|
||
68
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 34
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
34
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
The cortical executive system and the decision to eat.
|
||
PFC circuits (incl. ACC) are close to and
|
||
influenced by the adjacent olfactory, gustatory,
|
||
and somatosensory cortices, which compose
|
||
the insula.
|
||
Receive sensory information from the oral
|
||
cavity and digestive tract.
|
||
Play a decisive role in the eating; the ultimate
|
||
decision of eating is conscious and voluntary.
|
||
This can over-ride homeostatic drives, for
|
||
example.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Pre-frontal cortex
|
||
Anterior cingulate cortex
|
||
Insula
|
||
DOI:10.1111/nyas.13263
|
||
69
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Homeostatic metabolic/hormone
|
||
signals important
|
||
What kinds of
|
||
information
|
||
are signalled
|
||
to the brain?
|
||
DOPAMINE (VTA à NAcc)
|
||
OPIOIDS
|
||
ENDOCANNABINOIDS
|
||
DOI:10.1111/nyas.13263
|
||
70
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 35
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
35
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Δ Feeding behaviour
|
||
Δ Energy expenditure
|
||
Δ Adaptive thermogenesis
|
||
Energy deficit/excess
|
||
Energy Homeostasis: filling in the gaps
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Executive control systems
|
||
Reward systems
|
||
Hypothalamus
|
||
Brainstem
|
||
Hunger/satiation
|
||
/satiety
|
||
Longterm
|
||
Short term
|
||
GUT
|
||
Pancreas
|
||
Leptin
|
||
Other adipokines?
|
||
Hormones
|
||
Gastric
|
||
distension
|
||
Insulin
|
||
Others?
|
||
Fat
|
||
71
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Δ Feeding behaviour
|
||
Δ Energy expenditure
|
||
Δ Adaptive thermogenesis
|
||
Energy deficit/excess
|
||
Energy Homeostasis: filling in the gaps
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Executive control systems
|
||
Reward systems
|
||
Hypothalamus
|
||
Brainstem
|
||
Hunger/satiation
|
||
/satiety
|
||
Longterm
|
||
Short term
|
||
GUT
|
||
Pancreas
|
||
Leptin
|
||
Other adipokines?
|
||
Hormones
|
||
Gastric
|
||
distension
|
||
Insulin
|
||
Others?
|
||
Fat
|
||
Leptin resistance
|
||
in obesity
|
||
72
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 36
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
36
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Anti-starvation signal
|
||
Weight (fat)
|
||
loss
|
||
¯ LEPTIN
|
||
food intake
|
||
¯ energy expenditure
|
||
¯ food intake
|
||
energy expenditure
|
||
BRAIN
|
||
BRAIN
|
||
Ineffective signal due
|
||
to leptin resistance
|
||
LEPTIN
|
||
RESISTANCE
|
||
Weight (fat)
|
||
gain
|
||
LEPTIN
|
||
Leptin resistance in obesity – the brain no longer “hears” the signal
|
||
73
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Eating – for energy requirements & to have reserves
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
74
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 37
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
37
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
The Brain’s Energy Balance Systems: survival
|
||
… when food is scarce
|
||
Reduce metabolism
|
||
Food searching & consumption
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
75
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Daily
|
||
energy intake:
|
||
2000 kcal
|
||
Energy stored in fat: 140.000 kcal
|
||
Impact of a meal
|
||
on reducing
|
||
appetite
|
||
(important)
|
||
Impact of energy stores (and
|
||
hence, leptin) on reducing
|
||
appetite – cannot be the meal-
|
||
to-meal determining factor on
|
||
how much we eat.
|
||
Who drives eating – your fat or your gut?
|
||
Signals &
|
||
mechanisms
|
||
?
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
GUT
|
||
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.038
|
||
76
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 38
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
38
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
The meal cycle: hunger, satiety
|
||
and satiation
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
I’m full (= satiated)
|
||
I’m not hungry (=satiety)
|
||
77
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Hunger, Satiety & Satiation
|
||
Meal
|
||
Stimulatory
|
||
signals
|
||
Inhibitory
|
||
signals
|
||
Satiation =
|
||
meal termination
|
||
Satiety = absence of
|
||
appetite/hunger until the next meal
|
||
Eating time
|
||
Intensity
|
||
I’m
|
||
getting
|
||
hungry
|
||
I’m
|
||
full
|
||
I need
|
||
to eat
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
NOTE: People commonly confuse satiety & satiation
|
||
Image:
|
||
https://www.madlab.ca/are-your-
|
||
hunger-and- fullness-cues-out-of-
|
||
whack.html
|
||
78
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 39
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
39
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
VAGUS
|
||
Ghrelin
|
||
PYY
|
||
Leptin
|
||
Others?
|
||
Insulin
|
||
Others?
|
||
CCK
|
||
CNS
|
||
peptides
|
||
Marx J, Science. 2003 299:846-9.
|
||
Murphy K, Bloom SR. Nature 444, 854-859
|
||
Anorexigenic (i.e. eat less)
|
||
A. Increase satiety,
|
||
B. Increase satiation,
|
||
C. Cause nausea or aversion,
|
||
D. For some hormones, their
|
||
anorexigenic mechanism is unclear
|
||
(ie. A,B and/or C)
|
||
Orexigenic (i.e. eat more)
|
||
E. Increase hunger
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Anorexigenic and orexigenic hormones
|
||
79
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
GUT
|
||
Behavioral
|
||
Responses
|
||
Autonomic
|
||
Responses
|
||
Endocrine
|
||
Responses
|
||
ENERGY BALANCE
|
||
PANCREAS
|
||
ADIPOSE TISSUE
|
||
LIVER
|
||
NUTRIENTS
|
||
LEPTIN
|
||
ADIPOKINES
|
||
PP
|
||
AMYLIN
|
||
GLUCAGON
|
||
INSULIN
|
||
GHRELIN
|
||
CCK
|
||
PYY (3-36)
|
||
GLP-1
|
||
OXM
|
||
NPY
|
||
AgRP
|
||
POMC
|
||
CART
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
80
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 40
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
40
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Important gut hormones for energy
|
||
balance
|
||
Ghrelin
|
||
Gastrin
|
||
GLP-1
|
||
GLP-2
|
||
Oxyntomodulin
|
||
PYY(3-36)
|
||
FGF19
|
||
CCK
|
||
Secretin
|
||
GIP
|
||
Motilin
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
GLP-1 and GLP-2 (Glucagon-like peptides), CCK (cholecystokinin), GIP (Gastric
|
||
inhibitory peptide), Peptide YY 3-36 (PYY3-36), Fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19)
|
||
81
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Distribution of enteroendocrine cells in gut
|
||
Ghrelin
|
||
CCK
|
||
GLP-1
|
||
PYY(3-36)
|
||
stomach
|
||
Small
|
||
intestine
|
||
bowel
|
||
Steinert et al., Physiol Rev 2017; 97:411
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
82
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 41
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
41
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Cell
|
||
type
|
||
Highest density
|
||
Peptide released
|
||
G-cells
|
||
Stomach
|
||
Gastrin
|
||
X-cells
|
||
Stomach
|
||
Ghrelin
|
||
ECL-
|
||
cells
|
||
Stomach
|
||
Histamine
|
||
???
|
||
Stomach & duodenum
|
||
Gastrin-releasing peptide
|
||
(GRP)
|
||
S-cells
|
||
Duodenum and jegunum
|
||
Secretin
|
||
I-cells
|
||
Duodenum and jegunum
|
||
Cholecystokinin (CCK)
|
||
K-cells
|
||
Duodenum and jegunum
|
||
Glucose-dependent
|
||
insulinotropic peptide (GIP).
|
||
N-cells
|
||
Ileum
|
||
Neurotensin
|
||
L-cells
|
||
Ileum and Colon
|
||
Glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1)
|
||
L-cells
|
||
Ileum and Colon
|
||
PYY3-36
|
||
D-cells
|
||
Entire GI tract
|
||
Somatostatin
|
||
EC-cells Entire GI tract
|
||
Serotonin
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
83
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Gut peptides influencing energy balance
|
||
1. PYY (3-36):
|
||
Ø Anorexigenic. Produced esp. by the ileum, colon and
|
||
rectum (L cells) in response to feeding/meals.
|
||
Ø Signals satiety (long inhibition of eating).
|
||
Ø It is an agonist at the Y2 receptor (ie NPY receptor
|
||
subtype 2), a presynaptic NPY receptor. (Note: other
|
||
NPY receptors are post-synaptic). C.f. NPY acting at
|
||
Y1 post-synaptic receptors that is orexigenic)
|
||
Ø Target systems: Arc very important for anorexigenic
|
||
effect. Y2 receptors also located in DVC and
|
||
amygdala.
|
||
Ø Obesity does not appear to be associated with
|
||
reduced PYY3-36 levels although there are promising
|
||
effects to reduce meal size.
|
||
Y2
|
||
(autoreceptor)
|
||
Y1
|
||
NPY
|
||
Food intake
|
||
PYY(3-36)
|
||
-ve
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
84
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 42
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
42
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Batterham et al., Nature 450, 106-109
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
In healthy subjects, PYY(3-36) reduces caloric intake in
|
||
a buffet meal
|
||
85
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Gut peptides influencing energy balance
|
||
2. GLP-1 (and oxyntomodulin)
|
||
Ø Mostly produced in the ileum, in the L cells (that also produce PYY3-36)
|
||
Ø Proglucagon (precursor for GLP-1, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) and
|
||
oxyntomodulin).
|
||
Ø Circulating levels increase after meals.
|
||
Ø Exendin 4: GLP-1 receptor agonist (first isolated from saliva of Gila monster lizard).
|
||
Ø GLP-1 receptors in CNS: especially brainstem (DVC) and hypothalamus (Arc) but
|
||
also reward system. Acts as a satiety signal.
|
||
Ø Oxyntomodulin also binds to the GLP-1R
|
||
Ø GLP-1 and oxytomodulin à↓food intake and ↓food reward. ↓gastric motility.
|
||
Ø Long-acting GLP-1 agonists now used clinically (e.g., Liraglutide, Semaglutide)
|
||
Ø Improved glucose homeostasis (via its incretin effects – see glucose lecture
|
||
from me).
|
||
Ø Weight loss
|
||
Gila
|
||
monster
|
||
lizard
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
86
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 43
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
43
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Ozempic (Semaglutide) – anti-obesity drug
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Long acting
|
||
GLP-1 analogue
|
||
87
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Gut peptides influencing energy balance
|
||
3. Cholecystokinin (CCK)
|
||
Ø Produced by I cells in the GI tract (eg duodenum and jejunum)
|
||
Ø Release increased especially by fat or protein in duodenum
|
||
Ø Causes meal termination (satiation signal)
|
||
Ø Also suppresses gastric emptying
|
||
Ø Two CCK receptors exist (CCK1 and CCK2) and can be found
|
||
on vagal afferents as well as in relevant brain areas, especially
|
||
brainstem (NTS, AP, Dra, the dorsal raphe) but also in reward
|
||
areas.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
88
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 44
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
44
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
•
|
||
Insulin and amylin. release from beta cells regulated by
|
||
gut hormones (especially GLP-1 and GIP).
|
||
•
|
||
Glucagon. Increases FGF21 release from the liver.
|
||
•
|
||
Pancreatic polypeptide (PP)
|
||
Glucagon
|
||
Insulin
|
||
Amylin
|
||
FGF21
|
||
PP
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Pancreatic hormones
|
||
FGF21
|
||
-
|
||
a hormone secreted by the
|
||
liver
|
||
-
|
||
regulates sugar intake and
|
||
preferences for sweet foods
|
||
via signaling through FGF21
|
||
receptors in the PVN
|
||
(hypothalamus)
|
||
89
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Pancreatic hormones and energy balance
|
||
1. Insulin
|
||
ØReleased in association with meals.
|
||
ØInsulin receptors - hypothalamus (NPY, POMC) and brain
|
||
stem (nucleus tractus solitarius).
|
||
ØDirect brain action: Reduces food intake (and increases
|
||
energy expenditure).
|
||
ØMay act as a satiety signal. Also provides a marker of fat
|
||
mass (obese individuals have high levels).
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
90
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 45
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
45
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Pancreatic hormones and energy balance
|
||
2. Amylin – a satiation signal?
|
||
Ø Produced by pancreatic beta cells
|
||
Ø Eating triggers release in proportion to
|
||
caloric load
|
||
Ø When administered with leptin, a
|
||
synergistic effect for weight loss was
|
||
observed.
|
||
Ø Role: slows appearance of nutrients in
|
||
blood after meals by (i) ↓food intake
|
||
(decreased meal size), (ii) slowing gastric
|
||
emptying, (iii) inhibiting digestive
|
||
secretions [gastric acid, pancreatic
|
||
enzymes, and bile ejection].
|
||
Ø Centrally acting eg area postrema of the
|
||
brain stem.
|
||
Maintenance of body weight loss
|
||
induced by sustained infusion of
|
||
amylin + leptin combination
|
||
requires the presence of both
|
||
amylin and leptin in diet-induced
|
||
obese rats.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
doi-
|
||
org.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/
|
||
10.1038/oby.2009.187
|
||
91
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Pancreatic hormones and energy balance
|
||
3. Pancreatic polypeptide
|
||
ØReleased after a meal (and in proportion to
|
||
caloric load) and reduces food intake acutely.
|
||
ØSatiation signal?
|
||
ØChronic administration reduces body weight in
|
||
genetically obese mice (ob/ob).
|
||
ØBinds to neuropeptide Y4 and Y5 receptors.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
92
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 46
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
46
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Ghrelin
|
||
Food searching & intake
|
||
¯ Fat utilization (RQ)
|
||
Body weight
|
||
200
|
||
0600
|
||
0800
|
||
1000
|
||
1200
|
||
1400
|
||
1600
|
||
1800
|
||
2000
|
||
2200
|
||
2400
|
||
0200
|
||
0400
|
||
300
|
||
400
|
||
700
|
||
800
|
||
Ghrelin (pg/ml)
|
||
500
|
||
600
|
||
Time of day
|
||
breakfast
|
||
lunch
|
||
dinner
|
||
Empty
|
||
stomach
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Gut peptides influencing energy balance
|
||
4. Ghrelin (hunger signal)
|
||
Cummings DE et al., 2001; Diabetes 50:1714-9
|
||
Hunger
|
||
GHS-R1A
|
||
(receptor)
|
||
GHS-R1A = growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1A
|
||
Tschöp et, al, 2000, Nature
|
||
Oxyntic
|
||
glands
|
||
93
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Cummings et al,
|
||
Am J Physiol
|
||
Endocrinol Metab
|
||
Ghrelin: the hormone that decides when you eat?
|
||
Hunger
|
||
Score
|
||
(mm)
|
||
Ghrelin
|
||
%
|
||
baseline
|
||
Time (% inter-meal interval)
|
||
Meal 1
|
||
Meal 2
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
94
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 47
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
47
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Ghrelin targets both homeostatic and reward
|
||
systems to increase food intake and motivation
|
||
Ghrelin
|
||
METABOLIC FEEDING
|
||
Food intake
|
||
REWARD
|
||
BEHAVIOUR
|
||
Food reward
|
||
Food motivation
|
||
Food intake
|
||
Food anticipation
|
||
Δ Food preference
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Main targets:
|
||
Hypothalamus
|
||
(especially Arc).
|
||
Many brainstem areas
|
||
Reward system
|
||
95
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Lever pressing for sucrose
|
||
How much work (number of lever presses) is a rat is willing to expend to obtain
|
||
a sugar reward à an objective measure of reward value
|
||
Ghrelin à Increased motivation to work for a food reward
|
||
FR1 à FR3 à FR5 à PR
|
||
Fixed Ratio
|
||
Progressive
|
||
Ratio
|
||
à
|
||
5 min
|
||
120 min
|
||
30 min
|
||
Number
|
||
rewards
|
||
(sucrose
|
||
pellets)
|
||
**
|
||
**
|
||
**
|
||
0
|
||
2
|
||
4
|
||
6
|
||
8
|
||
10
|
||
saline
|
||
Ghrelin 0.3 mg/kg
|
||
Ghrelin
|
||
FOOD REWARD &
|
||
MOTIVATION
|
||
WORK TO
|
||
RECEIVE SUGAR
|
||
FULL/SATIATED RAT
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
96
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 48
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
48
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Ghrelin:
|
||
Ø Circulating stomach-derived hormone
|
||
Ø Produced by the X/A-like cells in the oxyntic glands
|
||
Ø The enzyme ghrelin-O-acetyltransferase (GOAT), present in these cells, is
|
||
responsible for acylating ghrelin on serene 3 (makes it active).
|
||
Ø Increases food intake and food seeking.
|
||
Ø Ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1A) located in brain areas controlling
|
||
energy balance (eg hypothalamus, brain stem),
|
||
reward (eg tegmental areas such as the VTA)
|
||
also amygdala, hippocampus
|
||
Ø Physiological role: meal initiation, hunger, reward-seeking (eg for food).
|
||
Ø Obesity is not associated with hyperghrelinaemia.
|
||
Ø May be relevant for eating disorders, including those that lead to obesity.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
97
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
AgRP neurones (a target for ghrelin) signal the
|
||
unpleasantness of hunger.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Method: Optogenetic activation if AgRP neurones when mice are in the left
|
||
(Blue) chamber. Result. With each of 7 (15 min) sessions they increasingly
|
||
avoid the chamber in which their AgRP neurones were activated.
|
||
Conclusion:
|
||
Mice dislike having
|
||
their AgRP
|
||
neurones activated.
|
||
Likely they are
|
||
experiencing the
|
||
unpleasantness of
|
||
hunger.
|
||
doi: 10.1038/nature14416
|
||
98
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 49
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
49
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
hunger
|
||
satiation
|
||
satiety
|
||
Meal
|
||
time
|
||
plasma level
|
||
Ghrelin
|
||
CCK/Amylin
|
||
PYY3-36/GLP-1/
|
||
oxyntomodulin/insulin
|
||
Appetite-regulating hormones signal hunger, satiation and satiety
|
||
99
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Hedonic feeding behavior
|
||
Hunger/satiety
|
||
satiation
|
||
Meal
|
||
time
|
||
plasma level
|
||
Ghrelin
|
||
CCK/Amylin
|
||
PYY/GLP-1/oxyntomodulin/ insulin
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
100
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 50
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
50
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 1010, 729–740(2013)
|
||
Endocrine intestinal cells sense nutrients and signal directly to the
|
||
nervous system
|
||
Nutrient
|
||
sensing
|
||
Gut
|
||
hormones
|
||
Brain
|
||
DOI:10.1038/nn.3211
|
||
101
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Several neural circuits respond directly to hormones from intestine, fat, and
|
||
pancreas
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
•DOI:10.1038/nn.3211
|
||
102
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 51
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
51
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
So, what causes obesity and
|
||
what can we do about it?
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
103
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Arguing for a genetics component:
|
||
§
|
||
People in same environment don’t
|
||
necessarily have same body weight
|
||
§
|
||
The remarkable increase in obesity
|
||
trends over last few decades cannot be
|
||
only due to genetics.
|
||
§
|
||
Some ethnic groups are more likely to
|
||
develop obesity)
|
||
§
|
||
There have always been some people
|
||
predisposed to weight gain
|
||
§
|
||
Data from twin and adoption studies
|
||
§
|
||
Heritability of body weight is 70%
|
||
(almost as much as that of height 85%)
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
How much obesity is genetics and how much
|
||
is environmental?
|
||
EndocrineWebPro
|
||
104
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 52
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
52
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Dizygotic
|
||
Twins
|
||
Monozygotic
|
||
Twins
|
||
Wardle J et al Am Clin Nutr 2008 Heritability of childhood BMI in UK – 75%
|
||
Heritability estimates
|
||
#0.6-0.8
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Genetics of obesity: twin studies
|
||
105
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Genetic factors contribute 40-70% to excess
|
||
body fat.
|
||
Pima Indians – nomads - scarce conditions
|
||
but develop obesity when food is available.
|
||
“Thrifty genotype” hypothesis. Certain genes
|
||
in humans have evolved to maximize
|
||
metabolic efficiency and fat storage. In times
|
||
of plenty, these genes predispose their
|
||
carriers to obesity and diabetes.
|
||
Environment gives genetics (Darwin)
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Genetics of obesity- interaction with environment
|
||
Ravussin E et al., Diabetes Care 1994
|
||
106
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 53
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
53
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
§
|
||
Few obesity genes known yet (less than 5% of genetically determined
|
||
obesity).
|
||
§
|
||
Monogenic causes (eg gene deletions) rare
|
||
§
|
||
POMC/MC4-R deletions - MC4-R; heterozygotes have “middle” phenotype.
|
||
§
|
||
Leptin/leptin receptor dysfunction
|
||
§
|
||
>300 SNPs linked to obesity traits, emerging from GWAS. Most still of
|
||
unclear biological significance (eg FTO). The association of the FTO
|
||
region to obesity explains ~1% of BMI heritability, such that adults
|
||
homozygous for the risk allele, have a 2–3 kg higher weight compared
|
||
to non-risk allele homozygous (Frayling TM et al., 2007)
|
||
FTO = FaT mass and Obesity-
|
||
associated protein
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Genetics of obesity: known genes that contribute
|
||
107
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Manhatten plot
|
||
•
|
||
Subtle changes in individual genes impact on body weight.
|
||
•
|
||
The more risk alleles you have the more likely you will have a high BMI
|
||
•
|
||
Many risk alleles are hypothalamic.
|
||
108
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 54
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
54
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Source: Giles Yeo
|
||
Note, semaglutide is a recently approved drug for obesity that is caused by
|
||
gene defects upstream of MC4R
|
||
Disruption of melanocortin signalling causes severe
|
||
obesity
|
||
109
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
ØEpigenetics - the study of heritable changes which affect gene
|
||
function without modifying the DNA sequence.
|
||
ØEpigenetic markers are tissue specific and include DNA
|
||
methylation and histone modifications which mediate biological
|
||
processes such as imprinting. (Note FTO codes for a DNA
|
||
methylase that turns off genes)
|
||
ØHypothesis: early environmental influences induce epigenetic
|
||
variation, thereby permanently affecting metabolism and chronic
|
||
disease risk.
|
||
ØEg Epigenetic factors may explain why under or over-nutrition in
|
||
utero (environment) à risk of metabolic disease in later life.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Epigenetics factors and Obesity
|
||
110
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 55
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
55
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
• The human gut has a diverse microbial ecosystem (>2000 different
|
||
species, high inter-individual variability).
|
||
• Hypothesis: Gut microbiota contribute to the development of obesity and the
|
||
metabolic syndrome.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Gut microbiota and obesity
|
||
Evidence: Transplantation of gut
|
||
microbiota from obese mice to
|
||
non-obese, germ-free mice
|
||
resulted in transfer of metabolic
|
||
syndrome-associated features
|
||
from the donor to the recipient.
|
||
111
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
• The human gut has a diverse microbial ecosystem (>2000 different
|
||
species, high inter-individual variability).
|
||
• Hypothesis: Gut microbiota contribute to the development of obesity and the
|
||
metabolic syndrome.
|
||
• Evidence: Transplantation of gut microbiota from obese mice to non-obese,
|
||
germ-free mice resulted in transfer of metabolic syndrome-associated features
|
||
from the donor to the recipient.
|
||
• Mechanism currently being researched
|
||
§ provision of additional energy by the conversion of dietary fiber to short-chain
|
||
fatty acids?
|
||
§ effects on gut-hormone production?
|
||
§ intestinal permeability à systemic levels of lipopolysaccharides (LPS à low-
|
||
grade inflammation (as seen in obesity/metabolic syndrome)?
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Gut microbiota and obesity
|
||
112
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 56
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
56
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
• We have evolved to over-eat available foods to prepare for
|
||
a future famine.
|
||
• People with genetic obesity are fighting their biology. Prone to
|
||
make unhealthy decisions around food, for example.
|
||
• Obesogenic caloric foods are energy-dense and it is easy to
|
||
overconsume them, even when full.
|
||
• All diets that reduce caloric intake or decrease energy
|
||
expenditure work – if we keep to them. Why do they fail?
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
But what about dietary control?
|
||
Dessert when full
|
||
The happyfoodie.co.uk
|
||
113
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
• Decreased leptin is important when dieting – turns on the
|
||
starvation response: over-eating, ↑ reward value of food,
|
||
save energy for brain, switch off costly energy functions
|
||
(e.g. reproduction, immune system).
|
||
• The threshold to respond to a dieting-induced fall in
|
||
circulating leptin may be higher in obese individuals,
|
||
making it hard for them to reduce food intake.
|
||
• When hungry (or dieting) food cues are increasingly
|
||
attractive and it becomes hard to resist food.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
Why don’t diets work?
|
||
114
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 57
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
57
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
_
|
||
_
|
||
Intense hunger
|
||
Food craving
|
||
(Neuro)biological
|
||
adaptations
|
||
Dietary failure
|
||
Weight gain
|
||
Caloric Restriction
|
||
Dieting
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
https://www.upmcmyhealthmatters.com/the-5-ds-of-dieting/
|
||
115
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
!
|
||
"!!
|
||
#!!
|
||
$!!
|
||
%!!
|
||
&!!!
|
||
'()*+',
|
||
-.*/
|
||
)0+1
|
||
Caloric intake per day
|
||
Caloric intake
|
||
sugar
|
||
fat
|
||
chow
|
||
normal
|
||
diet
|
||
normal diet
|
||
extra fat
|
||
normal diet
|
||
extra fat
|
||
and sugar
|
||
hedonic feeding
|
||
| INST NEUROSCIENCE &
|
||
Study in rodents given choice diets.
|
||
Adan RA & LaFleur SE
|
||
The more to choose, the more calories are eaten
|
||
116
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 58
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
58
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
!
|
||
"#
|
||
#!
|
||
$#
|
||
%!!
|
||
!
|
||
#
|
||
%!
|
||
%#
|
||
"!
|
||
"#
|
||
&!
|
||
&#
|
||
'(F*H,-./01
|
||
23-/H4*(5S'H5.(7H,51
|
||
8S34
|
||
9:9;
|
||
!
|
||
"!
|
||
#!!
|
||
#"!
|
||
A!!
|
||
#%&''(
|
||
"%&''(F
|
||
*%H,H-%.*%/0%12/&%34/5ST
|
||
12/&
|
||
898W
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
| INST NEUROSCIENCE &
|
||
Animals on a high fat-high sugar (HFHS) diet gain weight
|
||
117
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
!
|
||
"!
|
||
#!!
|
||
#"!
|
||
A!!
|
||
%C'
|
||
C()*
|
||
+,%-./M.NO.P4NR6
|
||
*
|
||
*
|
||
| INST NEUROSCIENCE &
|
||
Animals on a high fat-high sugar (HFHS) diet become
|
||
leptin resistant & have a “hungry” neuropeptide profile
|
||
Effect of leptin injection
|
||
on food intake
|
||
HFHS-choice diet: insensitive to leptin
|
||
– it doesn’t suppress food intake
|
||
HFHS
|
||
Control diet
|
||
HFHS-choice diet: hypothalamic gene
|
||
changes similar to hunger à eat more!
|
||
118
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 59
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
59
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
_
|
||
_
|
||
Intense hunger
|
||
Food craving
|
||
(Neuro)biological
|
||
adaptations
|
||
Dietary failure
|
||
Weight gain
|
||
Caloric Restriction
|
||
Dieting
|
||
How can we break the cycle?
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
https://www.upmcmyhealthmatters.com/the-5-ds-of-dieting/
|
||
119
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Breaking the viscous cycle of weight gain:
|
||
bariatric surgery à improved food reward control
|
||
(Neuro)biological
|
||
adaptations
|
||
Dietary failure
|
||
_
|
||
_
|
||
_
|
||
_
|
||
Bariatric surgery
|
||
(eg gastric bypass)
|
||
Weight gain
|
||
Intense hunger
|
||
Food craving
|
||
Caloric Restriction
|
||
Dieting
|
||
We need to understand how/why bariatric surgery works
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
120
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 60
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
60
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Bariatric (weight loss) surgery
|
||
Gastric banding
|
||
Vertical banded
|
||
gastroplasty
|
||
Gastric bypass
|
||
Only effective
|
||
Obesity therapy
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
121
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Swedish Obese Subject study: Weight loss
|
||
after bariatric surgeries
|
||
Change
|
||
in
|
||
Body
|
||
Weight
|
||
(%)
|
||
control
|
||
banding
|
||
Ventral-banded
|
||
gastroplasty
|
||
Gastric bypass
|
||
Sjöstöm L et al NEJM 2004
|
||
122
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 61
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
61
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Gastric bypass surgery à weight loss and reduced
|
||
mortality. Life expectancy by 12 years.
|
||
Swedish Obese Subject study: Mortality
|
||
123
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
The future: Novel obesity therapies that “bypass”
|
||
gastric bypass?
|
||
(Neuro)biological
|
||
adaptations
|
||
Dietary failure
|
||
_
|
||
_
|
||
_
|
||
_
|
||
Bariatric surgery
|
||
(eg gastric bypass)
|
||
Weight gain
|
||
Intense hunger
|
||
Food craving
|
||
Caloric Restriction
|
||
Dieting
|
||
¯ Ghrelin
|
||
PYY
|
||
GLP-1
|
||
It is not yet clear that these changes in hormone levels
|
||
are important for the weight loss after gastric bypass!!!
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
124
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 62
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
62
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Gastric Bypass surgery: Physiology
|
||
Food enters small gastric pouch à fullness sensed (nervous)
|
||
Discomfort & vomiting if over-eat.
|
||
When food enters small intestine à Anorexigenic hormones released
|
||
eg CCK (duodenum), GLP-1 & PYY(3-36) (ileum)
|
||
Mechanism
|
||
Decreased container function /restriction? Probably not – other
|
||
restrictive procedures are less effective.
|
||
Malabsorption? Certainly not a primary mechanism.
|
||
Increased energy expenditure (eg could involve increased bile salts
|
||
taken up into blood).
|
||
Increased anorexigenic signals after meals and/or decreased ghrelin
|
||
before meals? Hormones likely contribute to weight loss success.
|
||
Improved food choice – brain reward system implicated.
|
||
Others? Eg microbiota, nutrient sensing by gut.
|
||
… actually … we don’t really know.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
125
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Anti-obesity drugs: possible mechanisms?
|
||
Ø Decrease food intake (reduce hunger, reduce reward, increase
|
||
satiety, delay meal initiation, reduce portion size, improve
|
||
choice)
|
||
Ø Decrease gut uptake of nutrients
|
||
Ø Increase energy expenditure (ie the use of energy by the
|
||
body).
|
||
Longterm effects only persist if we can reduce the ”set point”
|
||
(ie make an individual percieve their energy homeostasis to
|
||
be set at a level lower that it is).
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
126
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Page 63
|
||
|
||
2025-05-05
|
||
63
|
||
UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG | SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY
|
||
Energy Balance Fluctuations Over a Day
|
||
Adan RA, TINS, 2013, 36: 133–140
|
||
-ve
|
||
+ve
|
||
Preventative and treatment strategies for obesity should
|
||
target especially food intake.
|
||
| INST. NEUROSCIENCE & PHYSIOLOGY | SUZANNE L DICKSON
|
||
127
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|